Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Reading 4

I found that the manifestos were very different from what I was initially expecting. So much emphasis nowadays is placed upon creating the perfect shot in a movie or producing a "reality" show, when really it is for the most part completely staged. As others before me, I felt that the Dogme95 was the most extreme example of not interfering with what naturally occurs in film- most likely because of the strict outlines that were proposed for making a correct piece of realistic film. While I can see what this manifesto is saying, I don't think that interference from the director as well as music, etc. takes away from the reality of a piece necessarily. The content is still there if one was to film truthfully and adding music or perhaps just showing bits of a documentary type piece would in my opinion, simply enhance the reality of the piece and cause the viewer to think about the intent more.
Overall though, I found the Lumiere most relatable and understandable. While I don't necessarily have anything against editing, I can most definitely enjoy the simple and realistic documentary (American Movie is a good one). Watching a piece for 60 seconds with no editing, music, etc. seems like something that could be completely inspiring if done the right way, and I enjoyed the stress placed upon the simplicity of life and how simply a butterfly flapping its wings could be earth shattering.

No comments: